Eyes on Trade

Public Citizen's Global Trade Watch blog on globalization and trade

What's New -
Global Trade Watch

Aug. 20 - Blog: Huffington Post: Does the U.S. Trade Rep. Secretly Love Higher Tariffs?
Aug. 9 - Report: Investment Rules in Trade Agreements: Top 10 Changes to Build a Pro-Labor, Pro-Community, and Pro-Environment Trans-Pacific Partnership
Aug. 5 - Map: Under the Korea FTA, These Multinational Corporations Could Challenge U.S. and Korean Law
Aug. 4 -
Blog: Huffington Post: Tribunal OKs Mining Corp's CAFTA Attack on Green Policy: Did Team Obama Really Need More Reasons to Renegotiate Bush's NAFTA-Style Trade Deals? 
Aug. 3 - Press Release: Pac Rim CAFTA Challenge of Salvadoran Environmental, Mining Safety Policies Given Go-Ahead by Tribunal
Jul. 30 - Blog: Huffington Post: Turn Away from the Cliff on Trade, State Legislators Group Tells Obama
Click here for the 'What's New' Archives


Related Documents

Fact Sheets
Letters
Press Releases
Reports
Testimony

Trade Agreements Undermine Food and Product Safety

The rapid growth in imported food combined with current trade pact rules prioritizing expansion of food trade volumes by limiting countries' food safety policies means that U.S. consumers are increasingly being forced to rely on foreign governments to regulate the safety of foods sold and consumed here. Unfortunately, recent experience has highlighted that many foreign regulatory systems are simply not up to the task. Thus, relying on foreign governments and their food safety systems to protect Americans' health is a recipe for disaster.

Americans expect the food they eat meets U.S. safety standards. One particularly dangerous trade agreement limitation on food safety involves obligations related to "equivalence" - the requirement that countries may no longer require imported food to actually meet their domestic standards. Under current U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) equivalence policy some imported meat and poultry fails to meet U.S. standards. USDA has found equivalence and sought to force U.S. consumers to rely on the food safety systems of countries known for widespread and deadly safety failures. Changes are needed to the relevant U.S. laws and regulations implementing trade pact food safety-related policies, notably including meat and poultry equivalence policy.

As President Obama begins developing new food safety plans, proposed trade pacts pending before Congress would replicate and lock in limits on the U.S. government's ability to ensure imported food safety. Included in pending "Free Trade Agreements" (FTAs) with Panama, Colombia and South Korea are limits on what safety standards the United States can require for imported foods and how much inspection is permitted. U.S. laws that extend beyond the FTAs' limits that have the effect of limiting access of imported food to the U.S. market are subject to challenge as "illegal trade barriers" before foreign trade tribunals.

Featured reports

Closing Santa's Workshop: How to Deliver on Obama's and Congress' Toy-Safety and Fair-Trade Promises - December 2008 (pdf)

 

 

 

 

Santa's Workshop: Made in D.C. with Bad Trade Policy - December 2007 (pdf)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Learn More About Our Work

Also, check out our coverage on this issue on our blog, Eyes on Trade.

Other Import Safety-Related Issues

Copyright © 2010 Public Citizen. All rights reserved. This Web site is shared by Public Citizen Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation.
  Learn More about the distinction between these two components of Public Citizen.


Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation

 

Together, two separate corporate entities called Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation, Inc., form Public Citizen. Both entities are part of the same overall organization, and this Web site refers to the two organizations collectively as Public Citizen.

Although the work of the two components overlaps, some activities are done by one component and not the other. The primary distinction is with respect to lobbying activity. Public Citizen, Inc., an IRS § 501(c)(4) entity, lobbies Congress to advance Public Citizen’s mission of protecting public health and safety, advancing government transparency, and urging corporate accountability. Public Citizen Foundation, however, is an IRS § 501(c)(3) organization. Accordingly, its ability to engage in lobbying is limited by federal law, but it may receive donations that are tax-deductible by the contributor. Public Citizen Inc. does most of the lobbying activity discussed on the Public Citizen Web site. Public Citizen Foundation performs most of the litigation and education activities discussed on the Web site.

You may make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., Public Citizen Foundation, or both. Contributions to both organizations are used to support our public interest work. However, each Public Citizen component will use only the funds contributed directly to it to carry out the activities it conducts as part of Public Citizen’s mission. Only gifts to the Foundation are tax-deductible. Individuals who want to join Public Citizen should make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., which will not be tax deductible.

 

To become a member of Public Citizen, click here.
To become a member and make an additional tax-deductible donation to Public Citizen Foundation, click here.